They say they want to link to something they know won’t go away.
EDIT: Adding this because what you said irks me. There used to be only one banner page on the top, but that doesn’t really matter.
The ‘you dressed that way so you asked for it’ argument really doesn’t fly.
It’s my content, and if I choose to wrap it in advertising, I should be allowed to. And if Wikipedia doesn’t like that, they can always choose to not link to the content. But to just forcibly take what you want because you feel entitled to it… Why would that ever be OK?
You’re vile. Taking an extremely serious and traumatic issue and using it to justify your opposition to something which is at most a pretty minor problem is disgusting.
They say they want to link to something they know won’t go away.
EDIT: Adding this because what you said irks me. There used to be only one banner page on the top, but that doesn’t really matter.
The ‘you dressed that way so you asked for it’ argument really doesn’t fly.
It’s my content, and if I choose to wrap it in advertising, I should be allowed to. And if Wikipedia doesn’t like that, they can always choose to not link to the content. But to just forcibly take what you want because you feel entitled to it… Why would that ever be OK?
Did you just draw comparison between redistribution of publicly available content and…rape? Dang.
Hey, if they choose to wrap their comments in completely inane reasoning they should be allowed to.
deleted by creator
You’re vile. Taking an extremely serious and traumatic issue and using it to justify your opposition to something which is at most a pretty minor problem is disgusting.
Meaning, your content changes often?
I only try to understand why you seem to be especiallly affected.