• SuperCub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I mean, downvote all you want but they’re right. No one picked Harris except for Joe Biden. The primary was half assed at best, and there was no democratic process to select the Democratic party nominee. You’re insane if you don’t think that Biden’s dementia wouldn’t have surface during an actual primary process. We could have easily avoided this Trump apocalypse if the Democratic establishment let us have a real primary.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      (pssst, the downvotes mean the community largely disagrees with you. If we were discussing anything lighter than politics you could just scoff and disagree and claim someone is correct, but that doesn’t stand up to the scrutiny of the people you share the world with. Sorry to tell you, you’re wrong and your childish political stance and the subsequent tantrum your ilk throws when called out on it isn’t helping you gain comrades or appear to be any less lost in the sauce. Get better.)

    • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      They’re not and you’re lying.

      The dnc occurred, the reps voted en masse for Kamala.

      The reps were nominated by the same process that has happened for over a century. The timeline was different but the process still occurred and you’re lying about it.

      The reps that voted for Kamala were nominated in the same fashion as every US election you’ve ever been alive for. It was a televised event where everyone in the party voted and agreed. Stop this bullshit.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Can you help me find kamala on my primary ballot from this year? ( I voted no preference)

        • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Kamala Harris is Joe Biden’s running mate.

          Were Biden to have been incapacitated, Kamala Harris would step in for him. We made this choice back in November 2020, and it’ll hold true until January 2025.

          Do you expect the Dems to have a contested Primary with less than one month to go until the General? How nice. Everyone will be tearing themselves apart in order to appeal to the various different factions that make up the Democratic Party, weakening each other until the final canidate emerges with a depleted warchest and a whole bunch of bitter people whose favoured candidate DIDN’T win? And assuming Harris, the VP and assumed successor for Biden, doesn’t win this contested primary, has to return the warchest Biden built up?

          And Trump will be waiting in the wings, with a building warchest and backers setting up GOTV. Again. Does the far-left WANT Trump to win, because man, that’s what it looks like to me!

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Kamala Harris is Joe Biden’s running mate.

            Yes I know.

            Hand picked successor. Why is everyone so mad that I’m calling it what it is?

            • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Because your phrasing is disingenuous. You imply nefariousness where none exists. He ran thinking he was the best choice, until he flubbed the debate, and … get this…he got the majority of delegates. 14 million people voted for him. And he won the Primary. Are you saying you and your ilk are more important than the 14.5 million people who cast their ballots for him (you couldn’t manage 2 million votes between your three alternatives to Biden…), and the 3.9k delegates he won? That their expressions of preference should be thrown out so you can have a bruising 4 week primary in August while Trump just uses your various attacks against each of the candidates and racks up hundreds of millions of campaign contributions that he doesn’t have to spend until September? And at best, we just use up Biden’s campaign warchest trying to fend your candidates off, and at worst, we have to start over with some relative unknown with a depleted warchest, and no access to the Biden/Harris warchest? And go through the whole rigamarole of qualifying for state ballots so close to election day? Not to mention the extra costs of running a second set of primaries because you couldn’t accept the fact that you lost?

              We had a primary. Biden won that primary. There’s no nefarious plan to install Harris. And the only reason that Harris has to run at all is because you lot showed up here and shat all over Biden over and over and over and over and *four hours later * over again. You lot being sore loser hard-leftists, Greenies pissed that they don’t have more of a say in government, paid actors and disinformation peddlers hired by Republicans and Russians to fragment the Left coalition like has happened time and time again (stupid ‘fall in love’ party), and of course those same Russians and Republicans who directly inject BS into our political discussion. And just to be clear, I’m not speculating on which you are, just pointing out that’s what your coalition is, and that’s why we’re here where we are right now.

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                You imply nefariousness where none exists.

                I’m just using the language our press uses for enemy nations, like calling it the Biden regime, because it’s what I do when warmongers are president, it’s what I did for Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump and here we are now.

                casual xenophobia

                I’m not speculating on which you are, just pointing out that’s what your coalition is, and that’s why we’re here where we are right now

                Like I’ll cop to being Russian but you need to understand it’s getting really insulting how often liberals go on about ‘the Russians’ like we’re some hive mind

                You know the cold war is over, you guys won, plenty of Russians left when the economy went to shit and in the end Putin is the result of your foreign policy goals. I have a deep hatred for both, because of how they have impacted me personally, and it really makes me resent when people act like anyone naysaying the current regime is just doing it because they’re Russian and hypnotized by Putin.

                • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  casual xeophobia --> You lot being sore loser hard-leftists, Greenies pissed that they don’t have more of a say in government, paid actors and disinformation peddlers hired by Republicans and Russians to fragment the Left coalition like has happened time and time again (stupid ‘fall in love’ party), and of course those same Russians and Republicans who directly inject BS into our political discussion.

                  Dear reader, just to be clear what this poster is trying to hide in its quote. It doesn’t try to refute a single word of this. No. It goes off on a tangent about how mean liberals are calling out the Russian involvement in propping up the Fascist Dictator Wannabe while tearing down Team Blue for the lulz. Despite the fact that I called out everyone in this faction trying to tear down the Left and prop up the Right, including the hard-core “Dems aren’t left enough” leftists, the Greenies that only seem to pop out during the Presidential Elections to tear down the Left and give the Right a chance to steel it, useful idiots who don’t realise they are being played, and the bad actors who really DO want a Single-Party Republican Dictatorship with elements taken from Handmaiden’s Tale, 1984, and Hunger Games for good measure. Rather than engage or refute any of these truths, it gets all butthurt about how we distrust Russians when really, all we distrust are the Russian government, who has repeatedly put their thumb on the scale for the Authoritarian Conservatives of our country.

                  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    Rather than engage or refute any of these truths, it gets all butthurt about how we distrust Russians when really,

                    Did you mean to call me it? cause my pronouns are right there

                    “I’m not xenophobic you took me out of context”

                    posts context

                    xenophobia

                    k

                    you and your dad are probably incredibly alike.

        • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Good for you! Pointing out inconsistencies as if they were national truths!

          You almost look like you’re pointing out a conspiracy BUT oh I’m so sorry, there is none!

          Point to the dnc! Not a png!

          Edit: to mention you didn’t vote you just now complained in a way to convince others to not vote. Thats scummy.

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Edit: to mention you didn’t vote you just now complained in a way to convince others to not vote. Thats scummy.

            What? I voted

            Good for you! Pointing out inconsistencies as if they were national truths!

            Kamala is Bidens hand-picked successor. How is that untrue?

            • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Simple she was nominated by the DNC. She was not coronated and Biden didn’t step out and say “Kamala” magically creating the bullshit you describe.

              Votes were cast by a variety of reps nominated by the same process that has existed throughout your whole lifetime.

              What part of that confounds your brain?

    • Awesomo85
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s the same thing that brought on the first Trump presidency! The DNC tells you who you will vote for and you will like it!!

      DNC supporters have Stockholm syndrome!

      • naught
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Man I’d hate to jump to conclusions but that’s a lot of divisive comments from a 24 day old account.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It’s especially dumb because democratic primary votes overwhelmingly chose Clinton. It was never really a race at all, pretty much from start to finish she crushed Sanders. So this idea that the dnc picked her and everyone was forced to vote for her is just hogwash.

          • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I could quibble about Clinton overwhelmingly defeating Sanders, but I really don’t have to. The actual numbers were 55.2% Hillary Clinton, 43.1% Bernie Sanders. Clinton won a straight majority of votes – not a plurality, a majority. And I say this as a Bernie Sanders voter who caucused (not voted in a primary, caucused, as in went to a school and stood in a classroom to be counted) for Bernie Sanders. Sanders came in second place because more Democratic Primary voters picked Clinton than Sanders. It wasn’t stolen. Clinton won that fair and square. Contrary to all the various little voices that crept out of the woodwork, and I say this, again, as a voter who caucused for Sanders, more Americans wanted a moderate candidate than risk a Progressive that could honestly be tarred as a Socialist.

            That said, I would have LOVED to see Crony Capitalism vs. Euro-Socialism as an election in the USA. Too bad, it was Fascism vs. Crony Capitalism…