• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Have the new rail lines reduced automobile traffic? Or are they adding lines in anticipation of future traffic?

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The PRC doesn’t have an already-built-up car-focused infrastructure like the US does for example, so they get to do it right from scratch. It becomes very difficult to get rid of that once it’s built, so its best to do it right from the start.

      They’re trying to account for current and future needs for city-to-city travel.

      • arin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        They also have and still invest in decarbonizing with electric vehicles with battery swaps as well

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Pure speculation on my part: The average Chinese citizen now has a higher standard of living, so the need for mobility increases. You’ll have both more car owners and the need for railways, which does help reduce the need for cars, but they also don’t fully overlap in use cases. You aren’t just going from people swapping their car for taking a train, but also giving many people that had no car to start with the option to choose between getting one or using trains for their travels. Which is good, but in absolute numbers you still see more cars.

      Similar to how China is adding both a massive amount of renewable energy and at the same time still building coal power plants, simply because the overall need for energy is still growing.