• fl42v@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You can argue with communists, you can’t argue with fanboys or those who accepted Marx as the one and true Messiah and tell you to read ze book instead of providing any points. But that’s applicable to pretty much every topic (oop bad, for example).

    • GrammarPolice
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m happy to hear this coming from someone on ml. At least some of you still possess the ability to reason.

      • fl42v@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Sorry to disappoint, but I’m not exactly into Marxism-Leninism, I’m more of an anarchist myself (the idea of dictatorship, be it of a working class or anyone else, doesn’t sit right with me). And ml was chosen at the time just due to it being hosted by the Lemmy devs

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The Dictatorship of the Proletariat isn’t a literal dictatorship, but an establishment of Proletarian supremacy over Capital. It’s still democratic.

          • fl42v@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Allrighty, a poor choice of words, then. What I meant was more or less along the lines of “while I like the idea of communism, I think maintaining vertical power structures while trying to make it happen is more or less doomed to result in yet another autocracy”

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              You may be interested in the article Why do Marxists Fail to Bring the “Worker’s Paradise?” Marxists disagree with the idea that AES states are autocracies, while acknowledging that AES certainly isn’t a wonderland.

              Additionally, Marxists don’t have an issue with hierarchy, but classes. The Marxist and Anarchist notions of the state are different, and as such judging AES by how well it advanced goals it never had is a bit silly.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  No problem! Let me know if you have any questions, it’s a short article so it’s lighter on details for tangentially related topics for the sake of brevity.