• DudeImMacGyver
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    a launcher that has a primary purpose of launching other games from other stores might have been a bridge too far.

    Really? Because steam has been selling games from companies who do this for years with the only backlash coming from upset customers that the corporations usually ignore anyways.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s still for games sold through Steam. Most importantly, that’s for games that the companies agreed to sell through Steam.

      If I was Valve, my biggest concern here would be that officially selling a tool for sideloading Epic games could be seen as approving of breaking Epic’s ToS. Epic is also very sue happy when it comes to attacking rival companies.

    • Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What are you referring to? Because in this case Steam would be getting a certain amount once for you to be able to play hundreds or thousands of games on another platform

      • DudeImMacGyver
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The many games you buy on Steam that then launch another god damn launcher from another company when you launch them.

        I hate it, but Steam never seemed to mind.

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Do they launch the actual EA launcher or Ubisoft Connect and you can buy your games from there and install them without giving Valve their cut?