• 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    It doesn’t have to, but in the case of eating animals it does equal cruelty. For what other pleasure than taste would there be this much bickering when the price is an animals life?

    Let’s stay with the dog in the picture, would it be cruel to stun it with a bolt gun, hang it upside down and slit it’s throat? Not out of neccesity but because you like the taste?

    Edit: Again, downvoting won’t change this :)

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Bolt guns are used primarily because they’re not cruel. The animal doesn’t suffer, it’s like flipping a switch. Penetrating bolt guns don’t even stun, they instantly kill. I don’t have an issue killing an animal for meat, as long as it’s done quickly and the animal doesn’t feel pain. Animals eating animals is part of nature, and we do it a hell of a lot nicer than any other animal.

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        You didn’t answer my question. The dog in the picture, if someone came over and instead of rescuing it would have instead stunned it and slit its throat. Again, not because of hunger, just because of taste preference, would you call that cruel?

        Oh btw. something being part of nature surely isn’t justification for humans to do it. Animals mate without consent in nature and I hope you are not a proponent of that as well.

        And bolt guns specifically stun their victims, they don’t kill. For the bleeding out to be quick and efficent, the heart of the animal has to be beating still. I’ve been to slaughterhouses and I’ve seen it.