• MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    OK, this thread is increasingly more interesting to me as a snapshot of people’s perception and less about anything Seinfeld does.

    So… we all understand that other people’s opinions aren’t held as an attempt to get our personal validation, right?

    Like, we’re not the adjudicators? Turns out right wing people don’t need our permission. Shockingly, they don’t even want it. The absolute hubris, I know.

    Believe it or not, Seinfeld’s status is not dependent on convincing any of us here that he has changed his mind on this one thing he said once. The right level of scrutiny of this statement is “Cool, I guess”, not “Well, Jerry, I’m going to need you to take some steps to rebuild this relationship”.

    It’s good when older men drifting right stop drifting right in that they become less annoying at family dinners and, if they’re famous, they stop disseminating right wing propaganda. That’s it. That’s why. It’s not a test and we’re not grading it.

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You’re 100 percent right. I do internally think the ‘cool, I guess.’ it just wouldn’t make a very good conversation on a forum.

      The fact they’re making a public statement does sorta imply they’re looking for some validation, otherwise they would just apologize to their closed ones and move on.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Well, it was a podcast, I think he was asked.

        But I agree with you, the call to action to comment incentivizes outrage. The normal thing to do is go “huh” and not post, but if you post you’re probably on the outrage side.

        I… really don’t like the dynamics that causes. It’s nobody’s fault, it’s the structural incentive system around this stuff.