The [Environmental Protection Agency] has set a 10-year deadline for most utilities to replace lead service lines, but omitted requirements for schools to replace the water fountains or plumbing that have lead components.

Archived at https://ghostarchive.org/archive/F5qXx

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You just have to keep exposing them to it to help build their tolerance. Eventually, they won’t even get hurt when you hit them with a lead pipe.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thats why I shoot kids with small caliber bullets. Just tagging them in the legs and arms with some .22 short rounds until they can build up a tolerance to fast lead.

    • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      To be fair, if everything in the system leading up to the school is lead free there should be minimal leeching only happening in the school pipes.

      If the pipes in the school have any sediment buildup sequestering the lead from the water there would be little to no leeching.

      Definitely looks bad when you say “keep lead pipes in schools” but the reality is still something like “95% of lead removed from water coming out of school taps”

      Also, might make schools likely to remove lead pipes if the system is lead free. No point in removing lead pipes from a school if there’s +20 miles of lead pipe leading to/from the school

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 month ago

        Still, the safe level of lead is zero. That last 5% is still detrimental.