• pickman_model
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Similar applications don’t have to be programmed from scratch every time.

    This sounds exactly like a COBOL programmer turned manager I met early in my career.

    Major projects can share expertise and costs.

    As opposed to tossing a dead raccoon over each other’s yard until somebody has to clean it up. Because I cannot imagine such office politics in the government.

    Applications paid by the public should be available for everyone.

    I demand my right to access military supplies management software code. And a nice Makefile to build that thing at home. Yeah, I have the right to that shit too. For recreational purposes.

    With transparent processes, others don’t have to reinvent the wheel.

    Now this is some fancy gourmet quality Dilbert’s pointy haired boss shit right there, oh yeah.

    Dunno folks, I’m not convinced.

    • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If you [ha]dn’t put up all those strawmen blocking your sight, you might see [] benefits.

      The way this often works today is that even the government offices themselves don’t have the source code for their own applications. This allows for private vendors to extract a lot of money for sub-par, insecure custom software. Government offices often can’t even switch to a new vendor without causing a full rewrite.

      • pickman_model
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        “the benefits” that’s a good one. I have worked long enough in tech and with the government to know how this will work out. chuckles