Google is weakening ad blockers as part of their MV3 extension standard and this will trickle down into all Chromium browsers. Built in ad blockers lack features compared to uBlock Origin as well.

  • BonerMan@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    To reduce reliance on Google… With the goal to change how advertising works, less annoying, less asshole ads would benefit everyone.

    • babybus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s not my browser’s job to report to advertisers, period.

      • BonerMan@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Its not doing that, you can use a fork if you want, or, and that would be the important part, put a condom over your internet cable before it enters the router, safety first.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            The data doesn’t go to the advertiser - it’s anonymized, encrypted, and sent to an aggregation service. The data isn’t about you personally.

            This is a much better solution than what’s used for advertising today.

            • Cypher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Where’s it go after aggregation? To advertisers.

              I don’t care if it is better than the creepy shit advertisers do today because it doesn’t stop advertisers from continuing to do creepy shit.

              All it does it give advertisers MORE data. It isn’t a replacement it is an addition.

              • dan@upvote.au
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                The advertiser doesn’t get your data directly. The data is aggregated using differential privacy so it’s impossible for them to see any individual’s data.

                • Cypher@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I don’t care. There is zero benefit to me. Advertising scum can go kick rocks.

                  • dan@upvote.au
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Would you rather pay for every site you use? Not every site can afford to have someone else cover the cost for you (which is how Lemmy servers are ran for example), and the only other business models that have worked online are either running ads, or getting users to pay for access.

          • BonerMan@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Good luck using the internet without having that data harvested by waaaaaay worse people. Again, just opt out.

        • babybus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          Why are you talking about things you don’t fully understand?