• intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    A computer that lands a rocket incorrectly is found out immediately.

    A computer that tallies votes incorrectly may never be found out.

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You do know that the electronic vote counts are audited, right?

      There’s a process to validate that the machines are counting correctly.

      • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, it’s called a paper copy of the vote cast. The problem isn’t technical, it’s a trust issue.

        You can’t trust an entirely digital process for voting, because either it’s not independently auditable, or it’s not anonymous. Our current system of vote counting requires an independent group of people counting a subset of the ballots in order to ensure the voting was done fairly. You can’t do that if the process is entirely digital.

        The people in this thread aren’t just jumping on a Musk bandwagon, the dude is a moron and he is trying to sow doubt in the process.

        I myself support the current scantron style system that we use in our local election offices here. You get the instant electronic counters, and you get a paper ballot that can audit that the electronic counters did their job correctly. There are many other ways to have a perfectly valid system, but this one is extremely robust against any sort of tampering.

    • zarp86
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Of all the hot takes I’ve read on the internet today, this is one of them.