fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoEquinunerous Setsmander.xyzimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1220arrow-down15
arrow-up1215arrow-down1imageEquinunerous Setsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareRain World: Slugcat Game@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 months agoconsider two sets: set a and set b. both set a and b contain all horses, ane nothing else. they are always equivalent.
minus-squareyesman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·2 months agoSure, but does the set of all sets that don’t include themselves include itself?
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 months agoEasy. If and only if the integer sequence A053169 contains the number 53169
minus-squareMatch!!@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoset a contains all horses. set b contains all ponysonas
minus-squaresteventhedev@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoGotcha. So all horses are purple?
minus-squarevery_well_lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoBut how can set b contain all of the horses if they’re already in set a???
consider two sets: set a and set b. both set a and b contain all horses, ane nothing else. they are always equivalent.
Sure, but does the set of all sets that don’t include themselves include itself?
Easy. If and only if the integer sequence A053169 contains the number 53169
Yesn’t.
set a contains all horses. set b contains all ponysonas
Gotcha. So all horses are purple?
But how can set b contain all of the horses if they’re already in set a???