asudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 小时前Concerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1441arrow-down16 cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1435arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 小时前message-square98fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarepmc@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·7 小时前Isn’t Vaultwarden used with non-free Bitwarden clients?
minus-squarefmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·3 小时前The clients are free.
minus-squarepmc@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 小时前They now require a non-free Bitwarden SDK component. That’s what this whole conversation is about.
Isn’t Vaultwarden used with non-free Bitwarden clients?
The clients are free.
They now require a non-free Bitwarden SDK component. That’s what this whole conversation is about.
Could you ELI5 please?