• piccolo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I mean they could. But it would only solve one side. I dont think the original drafters envision using usb as a charging platform but a data transfer between thousands of different devices and host devices. I dont think they intended for most portable devices to have one side basically permanently fixed.

    For exampe for each mini and micro type B connected theres a mini and micro type A connector. But ive never seen one in the wild, but its suggestion the intention for the usb drafters.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t think we’re talking about the same thing and I don’t know where the confusion is.

      Like when MicroUSB came out, I think charging was pretty standard. The cable can be a normal USB A to USB something that is reversible like USB C style, instead of the the USB micro.

      • piccolo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Like when MicroUSB came out, I think charging was pretty standard.

        not really, in 2007, USB wasn’t even the main way to charge phones. most manufactures were using their proprietary connectors. I recall Nokia was using their barrel plug well until they sold to MS.