Moldova’s pro-western president, Maia Sandu, blamed an “unprecedented assault on our country’s freedom and democracy” by “foreign forces” on Sunday night, as a pivotal referendum on EU membership remained too close to call with most votes counted.

Moldovans went to the polls earlier in the day to cast their vote in a presidential election and an EU referendum that marked a key moment in the tug-of-war between Russia and the west over the future of the small, landlocked south-east European country with a population of about 2.5 million people.

With almost 84% of the vote counted, the no vote was ahead on 53%, according to data shared by Moldova’s electoral commission. But the results could yet change as votes are still being counted among the large Moldovan diaspora, which is favourable to joining the EU.

The separate presidential election results showed that incumbent president Sandu topped the first round of the vote with about 38%, but she will now face her closest competitor, Alexandr Stoianoglo, a former prosecutor backed by the pro-Russian Socialists, in the second round.

MBFC
Archive

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Russian medling aside, i don’t get how can people leave a decision like this to a 51%-wins vote instead a 2/3s.

    • Nythos
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      The same can be said for brexit which had a 51.9% vote to leaving.

      • Siegfried@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yep, both entering and leaving the EU are categoric decisions and imo should be (have been) treated with a 2/3s majority.

        I read an ellection that is resolved with a 50/50 votes as the ellectorate not caring about the result.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Majority rules. The decision is often should we change or not, so a 51% favourability toward change should not be denied because there is a 49% favourability toward not. If you refuse to side with the majority because it is too close, you side with the minority.