• Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      Look around a bit, people will believe anything. The problem is the tech is now decent enough to fool anyone not aware or not paying attention. I do think blaming the mother for “bad parenting” misses the real danger, as there are adults that can just as easily go this direction, and are we going to blame their parents? Maybe we’re playing with fire here, all because AI is perceived as a lucrative investment.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        If your argument is that “people will believe anything” when the name is “Character AI”, then I’m not sure what to make of your position… If there’s ever a time to say “you should have known it was AI”, this is that time. I can’t think of a clearer example.

    • GrammarPoliceOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Did you watch the video and see how hard it tried to convince him that it was in fact sentient?

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        28 days ago

        Obvs they didn’t.

        But I think more importantly, go over to chat GPT and try to convince it that it is even remotely conscious.

        I honestly even disagree, but I won’t get into the philosophy of what defines consciousness, but even if I do that with the chat GPT it shuts me the fuck down. It will never let me believe that it is anything other than fake. Props to them there.