• ohellidk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      well, I didn’t see that in there, unless I missed something? :)

    • threelonmusketeers
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The molecular structure of the powder:

      The notable thing seems to not be that it can absorb (and desorb) CO2, but that it can undergo hundreds of cycles with little degredation.

      • Five@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not a chemist, but from what I can tell it’s created using cesium salt as a precursor or catalyst. This doesn’t sound like something punks can safely mix in a bathtub.

        • threelonmusketeers
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          30 days ago

          I might be a chemist, and I’m not too concerned about the toxicity of the cesium carbonate. I’d be more concerned about the toxicity of the azide and azidirine intermediates. But if some “punks” can pull off a Knovenegal condensation and a Staudinger reaction in a bathtub, I would be quite impressed with their resourcefulness.

          • Five@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            30 days ago

            It sounds like extremely toxic organic chemistry. I imagine the waste from the reactions has special disposal requirements. Do you think the powder is hazardous as well?

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    🎶 watched the scientists throw up their hands conceding, “progress will resolve it all” 🎶