As the title states I am confused on this matter. The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

I really don’t get the logic. As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Please don’t come at me with pro-Israeli rhetoric as this isn’t the post for that, I’m asking about why people would make such choices and I’m not up for debate on the Middle East, on this post, you can DM me for that.

Edit: Bedtime here now so will respond to incoming comments in the morning, love starting the day with an inbox full 😊.

Edit 2: This blew up, it’s a little overwhelming right now but I do intent on replying to everybody that took the time to comment. Just need to get in the right headspace.

  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    63·
    27 days ago

    I could very well be wrong about you, but I was led there by the evidence of your comments. Don’t want to thought of as shill, then don’t act like one.

    Faced with a contradiction, did you decide to address it? Nah, just repeat yourself, that will work.

    I hope that you someday have the courage of your convictions.

    Eh. I don’t usually involve myself with threads like this, so I am indeed much less experienced arguing them and finding good sources. It’s certainly not my job.

    Right you posted some bullshit and clearly did zero media criticism. Is this your way of acknowledging what I criticized? Do you see my point in my responses? What do you think about articles that just provide you a few quotes without rhyme or reason (except that supports a narrative implicitly), and then tell you the narrative to support? Do you think party-associated NGOs are representative of the people?

    I helped turn out more Palestinians to act action from weeks ago than there are people on that last list.

    Anyway, this was in response to you saying that the Palestinians ‘generally’ disregard Biden/Harris

    The term I used was reject. They are very aware of the Biden-Harris regimes genocide of their people. They do not disregard the murderers of their families.

    I think that is still questionable.

    You obviously have zero familia with this topic. We both know you hastily Googled your three links. I wonder if you even read them. Instead of making guesses and believing them and then fighting poplee to defend, why don’tyou get involved with some local anti-genoxide groups? Or at least just be honest. Remember, you actually started this topic by saying most support Harris, which was clearly pulled out of your ass.

    And even if the majority do, way over half the US is failing to vote for their own interests (because non-voting counts) so that unfortunately would not be too surprising.

    The most defining aspect of US voters is that they routinely vote against their own interests. They are awash in a sea of propaganda and PR and false consciousness that scapegoats immigrants for problems created by CEOs and the economic system.

    Nice comeback.

    You can’t ask me to take what you said seriously.

    You think my inability to know what you Really believe (as opposed to what you write) makes you not a shill? Sorry, I’m not able to follow that logic.

    I think you don’t know what a shill is. Look it up. It is not “someone that advocates for something”. It is a person that pretends to believe or push something they don’t so that they can push something else.

    I am obviously sharing my opinions and honestly advocating consistently for my position. Comoare this to your evasiveness and doubling down in things you made up on the spot.

    My team is not great on this count, but the other team (and yes there are only two this election) is so much worse that’s it’s not even funny.

    There is no worse than genocide. And your team has been excellent at excusing and normalizing it, such as what you are doing right now in your attempt to attack me for rejecting your genocide. If Trump were in office I would probably see you in the street. Because Biden is in office, you are here defending it.

    Trying to convince people to not vote for the only candidate that has a very slight chance of not supporting Israel as much really bothers me.

    Yeah duh that is why you are lying about me. You have been scratched by the prospect that someone would doubt your lesser-evil-for-genocide position that has given you license to support these monsters and harass those who don’t.

    Your lesser evil logic is self-defeating and irrational. Given that you have spent so little time critically evaluating it, I expect you to adopt an anti-genocide stance until you are politically literate just like you would if your family was facing these crimes.

    Never again means never again for anyone. It is happening now. Are you going to fight it or support it?

    It’s not ideal, but there is no better example I’ve seen of the perfect being the enemy of the good.

    Genocide is not good. Do I need to explain this to you?

    Same

    I don’t lie. “I’m rubber you’re glue” doesn’t work when only one of us is acting like this.