• Bone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I don’t know why people would pay for the news when they aren’t on your side.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      News are not supposed to take sides, they should present facts regardless of who (dis)likes them

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Except news outlets get so caught up in being “neutral” and “fair” that they won’t accurately report on things when shit gets really fucking bad like now. As an example, NYT basically made no mention of the concentration camps when they were publishing during WWII, or it was relegated to back-page short articles, because they were afraid of being accused of “bias” if they reported the truth, which was “hey Germany is literally carrying out a genocide while waging this war.” You see it NOW with tons of media outlets going “Donald Trump suggests immigrants don’t belong here” when what was actually said was “we should unleash the military to drive them out by force.”

      • Bone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Do you think that’s what’s happening when you look out at the landscape of news reporting today? When the owner’s interests get in the way of presenting facts I believe it all goes out the window. If it was just about newsworthiness I think you’d have a point.