• lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Less killing is better than more killing.

    Attempted ceasefire is better than undermining said ceasefire.

    More amicability better than less amicability.

    Less Ukrainians die vs more Ukrainians die.

    Comparative logic.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        You seem to be under the impression that your not voting changes the binary outcome.

        This pyrrhic victory neglects to recognize that either Trump or Harris will be elected. And there is no circumstance that Trump is better than Harris. Not on women’s rights. Not on climate change. Not on Ukraine. And not on Gaza.

        Whether you like it or not, it’s Harris or Trump. Sticking your head in the sand doesn’t change this fact.

        So both the moral and pragmatic solution is to choose the lesser evil that gives the highest odds to improve all these groups. Which is Harris. Factually.

        • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You seem to be under the impression that your not voting changes the binary outcome.

          Me voting wouldn’t change the outcome either, considering I can’t.

           

          So both the moral and pragmatic solution is to choose the lesser evil

          Is killing wrong?

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Yes, killing wrong.

            Killing more people with less chance to kill fewer people more wrong.

            Again, dichotomous choice. Easiest choice to make, really.

            • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 hours ago

              If killing is wrong, then voting to kill some rather than more is still wrong.

              I request better options.

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Correction: it is less wrong.

                Standing by and letting someone kill more when your action could’ve resulted in less makes you as culpable in the killing as Biden and Harris themselves.

                • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  We’re standing by to let killing happen right now. I’m the one saying that’s unacceptable.

                  • lennybird@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    16 hours ago

                    You can’t vote so you’re irrelevant but still, no, the only agency I’m privileged to have is my vote. Doing nothing means more die. Voting Harris means less die. Simple.