Puerto Ricans cannot vote in general elections despite being U.S. citizens, but they can exert a powerful influence with relatives on the mainland. Phones across the island of 3.2 million people were ringing minutes after the speaker derided the U.S. territory Sunday night, and they still buzzed Monday.

Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris is competing with Trump to win over Puerto Rican communities in Pennsylvania and other swing states. Shortly after stand-up comic Tony Hinchcliffe said that, “I don’t know if you guys know this, but there’s literally a floating island of garbage in the middle of the ocean right now. I think it’s called Puerto Rico,” Puerto Rican reggaeton superstar Bad Bunny announced he was backing Harris.

After Sunday’s rally, a senior adviser for the Trump campain, Danielle Alvarez, said in a statement that Hinchcliffe’s joke did “not reflect the views of President Trump or the campaign.”

    • Canadian_anarchist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      What happened “no taxation without representation” that the colonists fought for in the war of independence? Apparently it only applies to white people.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        It was a lie from the start, it only ever applied to a few wealthy old white men who didn’t want any cuts to their profit margins after the British fought a costly war to defend them from French and Native retaliation.

        • Verat
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          While they dont pay income taxes to the IRS, they do pay customs taxes, federal commodity taxes, and federal payroll taxes (Social Security, Medicare, and Unemployment) to the IRS, which sounds alot like federal taxes to me.

          • raef@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            It also feels like it’s something different because they aren’t supposed to go into the general fund, but advance payment for specific benefits

            • irotsoma@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              But they don’t have a say in how the money is spent or whether the tax should exist. So it’s still the same issue whether it’s for a specific purpose or whether or not they benefit from it. It’s the freedom of choice that they still don’t have.

              • raef@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                There is an attempt to conform to the taxation/representation issue, but it’s never going to be 100%. Non-citizens and foreign entities are going to be subject to certain taxes within the US as well. At a simple level, there’s no way avoid sales taxes. People have to pay sales tax in states they can’t vote in either

                • irotsoma@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Sales tax is different. That pays for the infrastructure to get the goods to market, theoretically. Though admittedly that is not exactly true everywhere, the general idea of sales tax is for economic reasons, not residential.

                  And of course it’s not going to be 100%, but we’re talking about large portions of the population that were purposely excluded, e.g. women, slaves, etc., in the past, and currently lots of people of all genders and races who live in Puerto Rico, Guam, D.C, etc…

                  PR alone accounts for over 3 million adults, or about 1% of the US population, with little to no representation, most of them citizens. Wyoming only has about 580,000 people, or about 0.17% of the population, but controls 2% of the Senate, 0.23% of the house, and 0.56% of the presidential election.

                  • raef@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    We’re also not talking about taxes just for residency. The federal government doesn’t collect property taxes. I’m just trying to say there is some effort to not burden them unduly with taxes. Do I think they should become a state: yes; barring that do I think they should they be excluded from entitlements: no. The issue of statehood is complicated. Historically referendums in Puerto Rico have failed. At least some are happy with the status quo

      • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        2 months ago

        Got it, so North Carokota, South Dakolina, and DC and Puerto Rico. I think it’s a great idea.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I was gonna say it’s ridiculous to make DC a state, it’s just a city!

        Turns out more people live in DC than Wyoming or Vermont LOL. So I’m down!

        Also I’ve heard that monkey’s brains, although popular in Cantonese cuisine, are not often found there.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          But it doesn’t have an airport. Or a car dealership. There’s a car dealership a few blocks from the Capitol building, but it doesn’t have one.

          (This was an actual argument from the GOP on the floor of Congress.)

          • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            “The Constitution doesn’t say a state has to have an airport or a car dealership.”

            “WeLL It ShOuLd! We DoN’t WaNt sHiThOlE sTaTeS!!1!!”

        • KmlSlmk64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          IIRC if DC became a state, only specific federal buildings, such as the white house, scotus & the capitol buildings would remain as a territory (due to the constitution), but, because of a amendment to the us constitution giving DC the same amount of voters _(members of the electoral college)_for the president as the lowest-representation (essentially always 3), which only citizens living inside the area would be allowed to vote for, only the citizens of white house would be able to vote for 3 whole electors.

          I might be incirrect, as I am not a US citizen, but I’ve seen this mentioned somewhere long ago

          • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            If DC were converted to a state, presumably this would be changed so there would be no district. The federal buildings would just be buildings in that state.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I’m not sure if that’s right or not, but there’s been some loopholes around DC’s status before. For example, all members of Congress are considered city alders for DC. In practice, they delegate that to local elected officials and everything works like a normal US city.

            Same trick here. Delegate those EC votes to follow the popular vote of the city.

        • myusernameis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          2 months ago

          If we combined Montana, Nebraska, Wyoming, and both Dakotas into one mega state, they’d have about the population of South Carolina.

          But somehow they get 17 electoral votes to SCs 9 and 10 senators to California’s 2.

          So I vote for Monomskakota!

        • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          But think about all the food down there in SC, y’all can claim it. Maybe they’ll take some of the empathy and intersectional community minded mutual aid networks y’all got and we can all be a little fatter and happier.

          Plus, we all get more papusas and salpicon!

        • dh34d@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          As a GA resident right across the river from SC, I understand that sentiment. SC sucks. Those bastards stole our city name and our fuckin baseball team.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Puerto Rico periodically votes on whether or not to pursue becoming a state, becoming a state doesn’t win except in one vote that was specifically a non-binding vote on the topic and that had much lower turnout than other votes on the idea.

      DC was literally created specifically to not be a state, so that no state held the seat of the federal government.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It doesn’t, and the reasons for being that way are long in the past. The originally US wanted to avoid any state having the capitol at a time when states were more independent entities than they are now. People weren’t really meant to live there at all. Politicians and there staff would travel in from the surrounding areas. Of course, it’s evolved way past that, and the citizens of DC deserve the full representation of statehood.

    • explodicle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Edit: my information was out of date

      Tell the Puerto Ricans that, we’re waiting on them reaching 51% in favor.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        They reached a majority vote in favor of statehood in the 2020 referendum. We’re waiting on Congress. There’s supposed to be another vote in this general election.

        Make them a state, or give them independence. The will of the people of Puerto Rico should decide, but the current status is untenable.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          they should be a state. if they become independent the US will fuck them over forever.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well, they’d be thrown in with the rest of islands of the Caribbean on that one. That’s something that should change regardless.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              yeah but it won’t. if they become a state they get a voice. if they become independent they will get devastated by the US just like Haiti. and a lot of other countries.