OK, its just a deer, but the future is clear. These things are going to start kill people left and right.

How many kids is Elon going to kill before we shut him down? Whats the number of children we’re going to allow Elon to murder every year?

  • Kecessa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    No, I’m saying that one video of a Tesla hitting a deer doesn’t prove that they’re less safe or just as likely as human to hit things when using assisted driving.

    Show actual stats of accidents per miles driven compared to cars without assisted driving and then we’ll be able to talk.

    If we had videos of every Toyotas or Hyundai or Ford that hit deers while being driven by a human, this video of a Tesla doing it would just be a drop in a pool of water, but because it happened with an assistant behind the wheel people are acting like it means assisted driving doesn’t make cars safer.

    TL;DR: It’s an anecdote, without actual stats it’s just noise to influence people’s opinion

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Problem is the data is rigged. It’s road miles driven that autopilot deigned to activate for with cars that rarely need their friction brakes that are less than 10 years old versus total population of cars with more age and more brake wear and when autopilot says ‘nope, too dangerous for me’, the human still drives.

      The other problem is people are thinking they can ignore their cars operation, because of all the rhetoric. A human might have still hit the deer, but he would have at least applied brakes.

      Finally, we shouldn’t settle for ‘no worse than human’ when we have more advanced sensors available, and we should call out Tesla for explicitly declaring ‘vision only’ when we already know other sensors can see things cameras cannot.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        A human might have still hit the deer, but he would have at least applied brakes.

        You’re making quite the assumption there.

        I’m not saying we need to settle, I’m saying it’s useless to share that example if we don’t have actual numbers to compare the stats between human driven miles and miles in cars with assistance available and insurance companies would have that.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Bravo, you’re the first person to bring actual fucking statistics to the discussion! Per driven miles would be better than per driver but hey, at least it’s not just a clickbait article.

          • Kecessa
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            That’s an assumption I wouldn’t be ready to make, but maybe.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              are you saying you expect an average tesla to have more mileage than regular cars?

                • pyre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  because fuel stations are everywhere while tesla uses proprietary charging ports that aren’t compatible with other chargers.

                  forgive me but I’m not gonna take tesla’s own words about their mileage at face value.

                  • Kecessa
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    19 days ago

                    One costs a lot more to drive than the other though and the gas station vs charging station argument only matters if you travel more than the range of your car, with their models letting you drive pretty far and back without charging, it’s not hard to go over the annual average without ever needing to charge somewhere that isn’t home. Hell, any EV that does 100 miles on a charge can easily beat it without relying on charging stations as the average is 33 minutes a day!