• azuth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Europe (EU?) doesn’t have any boots by design. For the same reason any member is free to do so on their own.

    Any resulting conflict with Russia will not trigger the EU’s security pact or NATO’s article 5.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Or just stop being so freaking stingy withholding weapons.

    What are they waiting for? The UK to declare war on France? NO, they stockpiled all these freaking arms for Soviet aggression or fascist threats, and now its at their doorstep.

    I don’t understand what good Grippens and Typhoons, tanks, missiles sysstems and such do rusting in storage when they could do exactly what they were built to do, right now.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Remember that occasion where a Danish warship found itself in contact with pirates or Houthis or whoever, and it turned out half the weapon systems are not functional or something?

      This is what they don’t want to show. That any military rusts, so the initial moments of those countries’ participating in any war will be full of shame. The first weeks of Russia’s invasion are a good example of such. No, EU doesn’t mean this won’t happen. Yes, defense-related corruption exists everywhere. No, European militaries are not full of supermen somehow magically superior to Russians and Ukrainians.

      It’s very simple. The moment that happens, some people may find themselves under scrutiny for clear failures in their area of responsibility. So they resist. This is normal.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        NATO does drills and excercises, and I’m sure everything is inspected before its sent. They can just quietly throw away what doesn’t work and dodge that bullet.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 hours ago

          And in functioning democracies this well result in a report known to parliament where it gets exposed. You cannot and should not have the executive do things “quietly” in a democracy. Mostly for better, in rare cases for worse.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hopefully everyone is holding their breath for another 6-7 days and then we can deliver what’s needed without troubling the US election 😔

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Shouldn’t they be in a rush, instead?

        They basically have 7 days (or really till January) before NATO could be destabilized and delivering weapons becomes far more complicated.

    • Pringles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fuck off. Russia considers itself at war with the democratic world. It’s long overdue the democratic world responds in the only way Russia recognizes: brute force.

      If that means active engagement from NATO or even individual nations like Poland or France, then so be it.

      • Melchior@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I believe the war Russia is fighting against NATO has so far not killed a single NATO soldier, but thousands of Russians. If this is the war Russia wants to fight with NATO, NATO would be stupid not to keep it going. At this point the Soviet era weapon stockpiles are nearly empty, they need to buy shells from North Korea, the Russian economy is pretty much a full on war economy, which means collapse as soon as the war ends, while Russia debt auction run into serious problems and the sovereign wealth fund is running empty.

        The only thing the West needs to do is to keep sending aid to Ukraine for another two years or so. That will kill Putin’s Russia. It might even happen earlier.

        • WestBromwich@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          The strain on Ukraine is immense though, as the article states. Ukrainian men are told to fight. They’re being bundled into vehicles by military recruiters (it’s often vatniks making this point, but that source is a US-government-funded media company).

          I would absolutely like for Russia to withdraw entirely from Ukraine, but surely the human cost needs to be taken into account. I don’t think Ukrainians should be forced to fight. And maybe potential soldiers would be more willing to fight if Western support was better than it currently is - Zelenskyy is always requesting more weapons and the West just drags its feet.

      • unmagical@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s possible to fight a modern war without boots on the ground.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think there’s been enough Ukrainian dead. If those countries are Ukraine’s allies, not just partners, then they don’t seem to send enough troops.