• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    They added a line to the bot that includes Wikipedia’s stance on a source. And Wikipedia doesn’t consider MBFC to be reliable, so the bot reports that.

    If you scroll below that, MBFC rates themselves as maximally reliable, which I’m sure is based off of a rigorous and completely neutral assessment.

    Edit: although, reading the links in question they don’t seem to correspond to what the bot is saying. Perhaps this is some sort of mistake in how it was coded.