• peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That means the British Indian Ocean Territory will cease to exist, along with the .io domain and countless websites.

    That is most definitely not how it works.

    • Virkkunen@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That is definitely how it works unless IANA creates an exception for the .io TLD and keeps it alive.

      • Keelhaul
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        60 seconds ago

        Yeah, and even the .su (Soviet Union) domain still exists. There is no way that a TLD as popular as .io will not remain active.

      • fatalicus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        When I registered an account , I made sure to do so with an instance whose TLD is connected to something that should be around for a couple of billion years more.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t understand why they don’t just migrate .io into a non-country code domain. Hell, they could auction it off to anybody (company, country, or person) who wants it bad enough. Let it live alongside the other custom domains.

    • exu@feditown.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      Because two letter TLDs are reserved for countries. They made the mistake already with .su

      • doc@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yep. This is such a weird fear monger topic.

        If the country that owns IO ceases to exist then IANA will just make it an ICANN generic TLD. Such a widely used TLD won’t be allowed to disappear. The rules are all made up anyway.

  • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    How do we make domains more democratic? It seems so backwards that massive corporations and groups of massive corporations are the only bodies that get to decide things like this that aren’t literally states.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      ICANN isn’t really a massive organisation, it’s a technocratic non-profit with a buttload of advisory committees, including one for end users. The rules surrounding ccTLDs were tightened after Russia didn’t sunset .su, so they tried to take politics out of it, make it a wholly rules-based thing, but now it figures that the rule everyone wants to have is “decide on a case-by-case basis”.

      There’s also been various initiatives regarding reform of internet governance over the decades but in the end noone can agree on what would be better so ICANN keeps on chugging on.

      You know what would bring a quick end to this? If Mauritius doesn’t incorporate those islands into itself, letting them stay an autonomous territory. From British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritian Indian Ocean Territory.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          “it seems so backwards”

          They set the shit up, so they decided the behaviors.

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yes, it is rather backwards for a handful of companies to own entire blocks of IP addresses just because. The infrastructure was massively funded by public dollars, it should be publicly owned.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              A fair point indeed, but that’s not how it is. Public dollars were funneled one-way into private infra, in many cases.

              • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                but that’s not how it is

                Doesn’t mean it can’t be that way, though, One way nationalization also exists.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Make a p2p parallel system, cryptography-based. You subscribe to a root identity, and you fetch (via something, it can be NOSTR, it can be anything) its messages, which describe the current state of the domain list.

      If you don’t like that particular name provider, you may choose some other.

      There may even be some voting protocol from among few different providers, on whether to accept a name change. Then you may use a few of them simultaneously.

      Easy. The hard thing is to write the software (I have Aspergers, ADHD, social anxiety, chronic cold and house pests, don’t bother me, and I’m also stupid) and to make people use it.

      Something between Usenet, Fidonet and Freenet, LOL.

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          .gov (.gov.us) is used in the US to distinguish between commercial sites and sites run by state, federal, and local government institutions. It helps cut down on fraud. There are a few fucked up government sites in some states that use.com because ICANN isn’t doing their fucking job.

          There’s also .mil for military sites. And .net for internet service providers. These were the original oldie domains. I’m not opppsed to adding .blog to the list, but I despise all of these confusing random cash grab domains that ICANN approves these days. “.social” is really just an org, and “.biz” is really just a com.

      • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Not opposed to that, but I’m more concerned with being able to get one at low cost, would need at least .net to kinda expand the pool.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You could create your own DNS server with its own routes and registrars.

      If you got enough people to use your DNS network you could create your own registrars and your own rules.

      Users would need to switch to your DNS, but otherwise there isn’t anything about how the Internet works that requires you to use the big dog DNS

    • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not all TLDs are, just the ccTLDs. The .io domain was never intended to be such a popular one, but tech bros were like “zomg io! That’s like input/output!! So techie!!!” Meanwhile, .tech exists and is not country-specific but is far less popular for some reason.

      • Tanoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Meanwhile, .tech exists and is not country-specific but is far less popular for some reason.

        Simple answer: length.

        Two chars look a lot better than something with more chars, and all two chars TLD are ccTLDs.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I generally don’t trust .io for that particular reason. It’s the Steve Jobs of the world picking that for buzz; the Steve Wozniaks of the world would simply choose .org.

        And…, to make sure my joke didn’t lead me to find it Woz had a fucking io website, I looked it up and his personal cite is fucking org. Lol