You’re a prison abolitionist. You’re in a high stakes discussion where you have to answer seriously and be convincing.

Someone asks you : “yeah, but what are we to do with people breaking the law, then? What will you replace prisons with ?”

What will you answer?

Edit : Thanks a lot for your answer, they were very interesting and reflecting different ways to frame a world without prisons.

Except from one or two edgelord hot takes, of course.

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Everybody understands this, but struggles to apply the same logic to other topics.

    People don’t go: England is polio free, yet there’s people with polio.

    Perhaps this method of communication is something that will have to adapt. It disengages a lot of people who otherwise would share the same goals.

    • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t follow. We regularly refer to polio as being “eradicated”, even though there have still been documented (but exceptionally rare) cases of polio transmission even in western countries over the last couple decades. That actually sounds like a perfectly apt comparison for the goals of prison abolition, just not in the way you intended.