mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 4 个月前Bitwarden is now verified on Flathub for Linuxlemmy.mlimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1532arrow-down17file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1525arrow-down1imageBitwarden is now verified on Flathub for Linuxlemmy.mlmr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 4 个月前message-square54fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squaremitrosus@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down9·4 个月前What can flatpaks do that others -snap, appimage- can’t? At least they don’t have weird naming of program (com.sth.sth.fk)…
minus-squarehenfredemars@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-24 个月前Different goals and different designs. Why are there so many Linux distro? Snap is proprietary. Appimage does not include distribution and updates. It also doesn’t attempt sandboxing of any kind. On the other hand, I find appimage very convenient to use.
What can flatpaks do that others -snap, appimage- can’t? At least they don’t have weird naming of program (com.sth.sth.fk)…
Different goals and different designs. Why are there so many Linux distro?
Snap is proprietary. Appimage does not include distribution and updates. It also doesn’t attempt sandboxing of any kind.
On the other hand, I find appimage very convenient to use.