Not_mikey@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 个月前The blue line is getting thinnerslrpnk.netimagemessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1693arrow-down117
arrow-up1676arrow-down1imageThe blue line is getting thinnerslrpnk.netNot_mikey@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 个月前message-square97fedilink
minus-squareTʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·4 个月前 “smarts”, I guess you gave up on that Grammer Nazi shit huh? “Smarts” is a colloquialism Yep, you know my life history and personality based on 7 comments Exactly And yet you can’t explain your shitty idealism You never asked everyone else is wrong and you’re the king of earth. Finally someone gets it
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 个月前It’s bad Grammer and highly regionalized at that. So a douche and an anarchist, who could have guessed that combination. I did. We got the douche part already, lets take it back a notch before you cut yourself with all that edge.
minus-squareTʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·4 个月前Okie dokie I’m mostly only a douche to fascists and conservatives and capitalists and liberals and people I disagree with on small things Not to me you didn’t. I went back up the chain and I see you kind of half asked someone else, but not me Me IRL:
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 个月前So you’re a douche, you could have saved the inane exposition. I did, you should read again. https://lemmy.world/comment/13281517
minus-squareTʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 个月前That’s not asking for an explanation. You asked a yes/no question. Yes, no laws
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 个月前Yes or no being explainations is what? A new concept to you or something.
minus-squareTʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·4 个月前Huh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 个月前Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain. Anarchism exists yes, that didn’t imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense. If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.
minus-squareTʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 个月前 Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain. You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained? you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense. Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing. Lol
“Smarts” is a colloquialism
Exactly
You never asked
Finally someone gets it
It’s bad Grammer and highly regionalized at that.
So a douche and an anarchist, who could have guessed that combination.
I did.
We got the douche part already, lets take it back a notch before you cut yourself with all that edge.
Okie dokie
I’m mostly only a douche to fascists and conservatives and capitalists and liberals and people I disagree with on small things
Not to me you didn’t. I went back up the chain and I see you kind of half asked someone else, but not me
Me IRL:
So you’re a douche, you could have saved the inane exposition.
I did, you should read again.
https://lemmy.world/comment/13281517
That’s not asking for an explanation. You asked a yes/no question. Yes, no laws
Yes or no being explainations is what? A new concept to you or something.
Huh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?
Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.
Anarchism exists yes, that didn’t imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.
If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.
You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained?
Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense
Lol