• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a distinction without much of a practical difference, yes, but I still think that not considering atrocities a deal breaker and being in favor of the atrocities should be distinguished between.

    Can’t argue as effectively against a wrong conclusion if you don’t know the reasons for reaching it, is my point.

    And yeah, you’re right about them already blaming everyone to the left of Reagan for the pro-Cheney campaign failing to defeat a personally repulsive fascist idiot 🤦

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a distinction without much of a practical difference, yes, but I still think that not considering atrocities a deal breaker and being in favor of the atrocities should be distinguished between.

      Agreed until they start being hostile to all criticism of the party, even when the criticism is about genocide support.