• atzanteol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ah - you are correct - they don’t use those lines for freight (I thought they may). Still - Japan has some of the best train networks in the world.

    I expect this idea to die. People act like because a thing was suggested or being looked into that it will automatically be done. “Solar Frickin’ Roadways” never went anywhere an this sounds unlikely to as well.

    • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They won’t. Anything on a bullet train line needs to go at a speed of a bullet train. If it goes slower, it slows down the bullet trains on the line.

      Cargo does not require bullet train speeds, only passengers do. The added expense does not translate to a better service. Cargo is not time sensitive like people are, so usually freight trains go under 100 km/h. This requires a whole lot less infrastructure and a whole cheaper locomotives and wagon compositions, as locomotives and wagons that go faster are more expensive and require more maintenance.

        • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          they don’t use those lines for freight (I thought they may).

          They won’t use the bullet train lines for freight.

          • atzanteol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I know - I thought they did, but admitted that I was wrong.

            • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Tbh i just took it as a chance to talk about trains, not so much with the intent to correct you. Maybe someone would be wondering about it, you know ? I didn’t mean to come off as argumentative with you.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m still annoyed that solar frickin’ parking lots (canopies, not panels on the ground) aren’t mandated in all new lots.

      With all the mandated parking on the sprawl we could probably solve at least EV charging anxiety. And with some grid storage it would make a perfect use of otherwise wasted land. Plus keep the cars parked underneath cool.

      • atzanteol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s a big upfront cost to add to any parking lot though.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The parking lots themselves are a big cost to the rest of us though. At least they could be offsetting some of the environmental costs of sprawl.

          Plus the electricity production should offset it in a few years, especially in the places wheee shaded parking is most desirable.