• Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Something I haven’t seen discussed is that Kamala is a woman. There are a lot of misogynistic voters who will refuse to vote for a woman.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That explanation drives you away from the problems Democratic Party has. If people want to cast their vote, they will, if they are sexists or racists they vote for the other party. In this election we saw that a lot of people from both sides that voted in the previous election who didn’t want to vote now. It was much more people for the Democrats likely because they voted last time and were disillusioned in the democratic process.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Tammy Baldwin and Elissa Slotkin both won in states Kamala lost, so that narrative doesn’t really hold up.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Nobėdı ƿantſ t mentcėn ðiſ bikȯz it u̇ndṙku̇tſ ðeıṙ fæntėſı ðæt moſt ėmeırikėnz aṙ ſıkrit ſocėliſtſ weıtıŋ f æn ėmeırikėn Marx t ſpaṙk revėlucėn.

      spoiler

      Nobody wants to mention this because it undercuts their fantasy that most americans are secret socialists waiting for an american Marx to spark revolution.

      İt’z dju̇ſt ð leftƿacd vṙjėn v “Ekėnȯmik Eıŋgzuyitı”

      spoiler

      It’s just the leftwashed version of “Economic Anxiety”