• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    No matter what you can say about Harris, I don’t support any of it. None of it was “as harsh” as trump. Get ready for Muslim ban 2.0, etc.etc.

    What I can say is trump, and project 2025 have a whole lot more in store.

    So Harris, while distasteful, was harm reduction by comparison

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Project 2025 has been around for 40 years, going by various different names. It started out with contract with America and it’s been expanding since. much of the legislation that has come out of all variations of project 2025 has been 100% bipartisan. Bipartisan politicians that are voting along with legislation written by the Heritage Foundation is not harm reduction. Somehow liberals seem to have this weird idea that it ban is so much worse than genocide and burning people alive.

        • Shark_Ra_Thanos@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Truth does that when folks plug their ears and make noise about it.

          The answer isn’t them. It’s us. You. Me. Now. But go rant. That solves everything.