In light of the recent election, it’s clear that the Democratic Party needs a significant leftward shift to better address the needs and concerns of the American people. The party’s centrist approach is increasingly out of touch, limiting its ability to appeal to a broader base and especially to young voters, who are looking for bold and transformative policies. The fact that young men became a substantial part of the conservative voting bloc should be a wake-up call—it’s essential that the Democratic Party broadens its appeal by offering real solutions that resonate with this demographic.

Furthermore, one major missed opportunity was the decision to forgo primaries, which could have brought new energy and ideas to the ticket. Joe Biden’s choice to run for a second term, despite earlier implications of a one-term presidency, may have ultimately contributed to the loss by undermining trust in his promises. Had the party explored alternative candidates in a primary process, the outcome could have been vastly different. It is now imperative for the Working Families Party and the Progressive Caucus to push for a stronger, unapologetically progressive agenda within the Democratic Party. The time for centrist compromises has passed, as evidenced by setbacks dating back to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss, the persistently low approval ratings for Biden since 2022, and Kamala Harris’s recent campaign, which left many progressives feeling alienated. To regain momentum and genuinely connect with the electorate, a clear departure from moderate politics is essential.

  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The closest Democrats got to embracing progressives was nominating Biden. It didn’t really work out.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Is climate change legislation progressive?

        Is student debt relief progressive?

        Is UBI progressive?

        Biden enacted versions of all of those, and was more pro-union and pro-LGBTQ than Clinton or Obama or Carter.

        But you’ve kind of proven my point. Progressives won’t vote for someone who enacts some progressive policies, even if it’s more than any other recent president. Progressives demand someone who gives them everything they want.

        For years, all Democrats heard from progressives was “Not enough debt relief” or “You call that UBI?” And of course, “He still hasn’t earned my vote”. On top of that, progressives get very jealous when Democrats also try to please centrists. As though Democrats have to pass a purity test rather than try to maximize their votes.

        I do not expect the next Democratic candidate to even bother with student debt relief. I think the lesson that Democrats will learn is that it is almost impossible to “earn the vote” of progressives. They will always give up on you.

        Compare the success of progressives to, say, NRA supporters. Have you ever heard an NRA supporter say, “The GOP still hasn’t earned my vote”?

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Is UBI progressive?

          Inform me on Biden’s support of UBI that you are referencing…

          I do not expect the next Democratic candidate to even bother with student debt relief. I think the lesson that Democrats will learn is that it is almost impossible to “earn the vote” of progressives.

          Honest question: Do you expect the next Democratic candidate to win?

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Biden’s support of UBI

            Biden’s Stimulus Plan Contains an Experiment in Universal Basic Income

            Do you expect the next Democratic candidate to win?

            I don’t know. It depends on whether Trump screws the pooch for most Americans. I definitely think he will, so I think Democrats have a decent chance to win.

            But I think there is a more important question for progressives. It’s easy to criticize and browbeat Democrats, but that doesn’t help pass progressive policy. It actually makes Democrats turn away from progressives and look for easier-to-please voters. And maybe they lose once more, but again: how does that help progressives?

            I think progressives could take some hints from their opponents on the right. Anti-abortionists and gun nuts are fanatically loyal to the GOP. There is no question whether they will vote GOP in 2028 or 2032 or 2036.

            And they are very patient. Anti-abortionists set Dobbs into motion thirty years ago! They don’t care that Trump used to be pro-choice and didn’t really want condemn abortion this year and has probably paid for an abortion or three. Over time, the GOP has rewarded them more than any other interest group.

            In the end, parties reward loyalty. Not threats to stay home on election day.

            • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              The one-time $1400 payments following covid and a child tax credit is UBI? Oh, so you’re just being disingenuous…

              I think what you need to realize is that the Democrats genuinely need progressive votes in order to win, period. You do not have the numbers, otherwise. The progressives do not need Democrats in order to continue losing, they already are losing either way in a first-past-the-post voting system. That is just reality. You can forsake them and instead try to embrace “centrists”, but you’ll just lose, like 2016 and 2024.

              are fanatically loyal to the GOP. There is no question whether they will vote GOP in 2028 or 2032 or 2036.

              You’re also describing the “centrists” that Democrats waste their time courting…

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                “You call that UBI?”

                Just as I predicted!

                Democrats genuinely need progressive votes in order to win

                The point is that they do not need a progressive candidate to win. Bill Clinton and Obama weren’t progressive, after all.

                  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 hours ago

                    It wasn’t a losing strategy in the past.

                    The key for Democrats is to realize that “progressivism” is impossibly broad. So there is no way to deliver on that promise.

                    However, a candidate who does not identify as “progressive” can still deliver specific promises to progressives. Say, a carbon tax and a trans rights law. And that’s it.

                    For a progressives who care about climate and/or trans rights, that might be enough to vote for the Democrat. Sure, they aren’t promising UBI or student debt relief or housing or a minimum wage hike. Maybe the other things in their platform are aimed at Latinos and liberals.

                    But if you actually care about trans rights, why not vote for the Democrat who will deliver that instead of the Republican who offers nothing or the Green who can’t deliver anything?

                    I think there might be enough progressives who really do care about trans rights and/or climate to make up for losing the ones who only care about UBI. And I think Democrats don’t need every last progressive voter to win.