• MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nope. Climate change is a pollution issue. Reducing consumption can reduce pollution, but paying or not paying for a digital copy of something has effectively zero cost in the form of natural resources or pollution.

    • Quacksalber
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not saying that the scarcity of digital goods isn’t bullshit, but it’s rarely what keeps people poor.

        • Quacksalber
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I didn’t understand the meme I responded to to be exclusively talking about piracy.

          • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I mean sure, but the things people are prone to stealing physically, when they wouldn’t otherwise but for price, tend to be those they must have just to live. That’s not the sort of consumption we can ethically reduce.