Huge news!

  • DuckyMcDuckface@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The idea isn’t to use V2G just to store power for the building, but to act as storage for the entire grid. So instead of building large battery farms to store power, you use EVs are the batteries, which reduces infrastructure costs and can accelerate the transition.

    Obviously you’d want to have other grid level energy storage too, and some incentive to get owners to allow their EVs to be such a storage device, but thats the idea.

    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Batteries are heavy, even lithium batteries.

      Transferring energy into and out of an EV does result in non-negligible energy loss.

      Having a dedicated, stationary battery is a much more space and resource efficient way to provide a grid buffer. Pb-Acid and Iron-air batteries are much better for the environment than Lithium, and much more stable. They are much heavier, but still lighter than a Lithium battery powered EV.

    • No1@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That makes sense, but those incentives better be good for you to be putting any wear and tear on my battery that has limited cycles.