• Woht24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    But it is.

    It’s irresponsible to put into young girls minds that some fuckwit saying a political slogan equates to a rape threat and you should assault them.

    She’s literally telling people to feel safe committing an offence.

    I’m sure many people will disagree with me, go for your lives, but I’m not talking about the slogan or choice, I’m saying if someone says 4 words to you and you attack them, you will be held legally responsible.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Stand your ground laws disagree. If one party views it as a threat of bodily harm they can definitely defend themselves by preemptively killing someone.

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            This was such a weird time-line switch. Trump president again and progressives on Lemmy sound like r/conservative with law interpretation. So there’s no better response, no room for the very real needed evaluation of each situation, just a blanket “shoot em” now. Idk how people are so subjective to propaganda and influence when we have such a hard grasp on reality.

            • Doomsider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              A bunch of women shooting men for threatening to rape them would definitely get the stand your ground laws changed for the better. Sounds like a progressive win to me.

              Reality is a strange bedfellow.

              • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 days ago

                Just an OG fantasy accelerationist eh? I can dig it, but I think they would dismiss it as not being fit for the definition. Judges can and are allowed to be fickle like that.

                • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  It would be wonderful to set the precedent that men can legally defend themselves but woman can’t. Let’s hope for fickle justices who can’t help themselves.