• wildbus8979
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      For one they did not, at all, care for the results of the votes. Like in 2016 they just used Superdelegates to invalidate all the races Clinton had lost.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        16 days ago

        For one they did not, at all, care for the results of the votes. Like in 2016 they just used Superdelegates to invalidate all the races Clinton had lost.

        They did no such thing. Fuck’s sake. We lost by some 10% points, against Hillary fucking Clinton. This idea that the better candidate will automatically be the more popular one is some utter fucking delusion I keep seeing from the left.

        I voted for Bernie twice. I would vote for him again in a heartbeat, age and all. That’s not the same as peddling “The DNC STOLE the primary from us!”

        • danciestlobster@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 days ago

          At the very, very least, they are guilty of lopsided financial support and advertising dollars behind each candidate. The rest is largely supposition, though certainly COULD be true. Sometimes it’s easier to accept that than that the other voters are dumb. I have no idea which is actually true

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            I mean, even if you look at third party polling in the 2016 primaries, you get largely the same results. The DNC was unfair to Bernie - but at the same time, it is the primary voters who failed him.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            16 days ago

            West Virginia, where Clinton is the literal devil even amongst Democrats? Where the Obama administration was reviled, even amongst Democrats, and Clinton was still heavily associated with the Obama administration?

            Do you… do you think West Virginia is more socialist inclined? More progressive inclined?

            I spent most of my life growing up next door to West Virginia. West Virginia was a literal, not figurative, stone’s throw from my hometown. I know a lot of West Virginians.

            WV going for Bernie in the 2016 primary doesn’t say what you think it does.

    • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      16 days ago

      Using the superdelegates to call the race for Hillary the night before the California primary, He’s in the superdelegates in West Virginia and other states. Doing everything they could to stop Bernie. Watch this clip: https://youtu.be/QGuVDz_88po

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        Doing everything they could to stop Bernie.

        Not to mention the fact that we know the DNC was having their media outlets run interference on the Sanders campaign, painting him as a crazy left socialist to scare off the moderates, when in reality the majority of Americans approve of his campaign’s policies even more than the Dems’ or Repubs’.

        • wildbus8979
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          NPR would refuse to say his name, it was always “Hilary Clinton, and the Vermont senator”. Cokie Roberts was a Wellesley alumn.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      There was a primary in 2024 that Biden won as well. The DNC doesn’t need to spend much money on an incumbent’s campaign. It’s up to the voters to research their alternatives and vote in the primary. That doesn’t make it less fair, but suggests that US citizens are lazy or disengaged.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        It’s up to the voters to research their alternatives and vote in the primary.

        If the DNC give no alternatives to vote for then it’s not on the voters.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      16 days ago

      In 2020, after the moderates realized that a progressive might win, they coalesced around a single moderate candidate.

      The progressives did not respond in kind.

      The progressives then lost the primary.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Yeah everyone forgets their heroine Elizabeth Warren felt it was a good idea to talk shit about Bernie every chance she got and further reduced his chances by dropping out last minute.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          16 days ago

          You mean when we lost by some 10% in the vote against Hillary fucking Clinton, a legendarily unpopular politician, with even socialist-hostile West Virginia protest-voting for Bernie over Clinton?

          “But the DNC tipped the scales by showing favoritism”, yes, they wanted a coronation, but it didn’t come down to a handful of voters who were swayed by fucking DWS, it came down to Bernie not being able to overcome the long-standing nominee who had been building a ground game for her presidential run for… 16 years? Arguably more?

          Bernie threw his hat into the ring as a protest, not expecting to gain much support. He had to build an apparatus from the ground up in a matter of months. That he got within 10% of Clinton is a miracle and a showing of the strength of Bernie’s position - but also not a loss attributable to the sinister DNC mind-controlling millions of voters.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            the sinister DNC mind-controlling millions of voters.

            I would count media manipulation and advance debate questions as sinister mind control.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            16 days ago

            Weird that you didn’t feel the need to include this in your original answer, isn’t it?

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              16 days ago

              Weird that you didn’t feel the need to include this in your original answer, isn’t it?

              Lord.