• jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    I guess we see why ranked choice balloting was defeated everywhere except D.C. this year…

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean I dont think thats so bad. But I bet that makes the average Americans eyes explode.

      • Hideakikarate
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        My neighbor state of Idaho is actively trying to stop it by saying it’s “confusing”.

        • Cyyris@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          Alaskan here - we’ve had RCV since 2020, and this year there was a ballot measure to remove it… Can’t have shit in this country 😒. Being too “confusing” has been the only argument against it I’ve heard (AKA, no actual substantial argument against it.) Oh, and I guess that we elected a Democrat for House Rep because of it. Definitely can’t have that.

          • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            When it comes right down to it, that’s the difference between the Republican platform and the Democratic platform — Democrats say “here’s a bunch of options, please inform yourself and rank these according to what you think is best, and we’ll do what the majority wants” and Republicans say “all these rules and regulations are too confusing for you. Vote for us and we’ll get rid of the confusing stuff and make all the decisions in black and white terms so you can get back to living your life.”

            That’s the real reason why Republicans did so well this time around.

          • gdog05@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            These extremist patriots can’t be bothered to fill out a couple of circles in the name of democracy. It doesn’t feel cool.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            I can give you a bunch of arguments against it. You can just go look at my history if you want a bunch of sources. Not really possible to boil it down to a short and sweet answer sadly, but in general there are much better voting methods and ones that vastly fewer problems. RCV was invented before we had a lot of data on elections and how people vote and we’ve learned a lot since then. RCV is almost always a bad choice if you’re trying to implement a new system. Either go with approval for simplicity, or STAR or 3-2-1 if you want a very good election system with all of the benefits of RCV and none of the drawbacks.

            • Cyyris@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Oh absolutely, I did not mean to imply RCV is the end-all-be-all. STAR is my preferred voting system, but if it’s RCV vs pure plurality , I’d much rather have RCV.