• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Misleading headline. Nowhere does the article mention anything about banning such care for adults.

    It’s still wholly and completely shit, but the headline and the first paragraph are (as of right now) incorrect.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 months ago

      It will be kind of hard for adults to get gender-affirming care, though, when the government enforces that your gender is fixed at birth.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s like splitting hairs over whether a abortion is banned in Texas, cuz technically it is allowed under very narrow circumstances that no hospital is willing to try.

        • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not all gender affirming care is surgery. In fact, almost all gender affirming care isn’t surgery. He wants to restrict all of it so that as few people as possible can get on it, then eventually it’ll be an entire ban because he doesn’t want trans people to exist at all. While it might not initially be an entire ban, its pretty fucking close and will be expanded upon eventually.

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Repealing Roe V Wade was only about stopping late term abortions. It’s not that hard to read the room with this orange dipshit.