grrgyle@slrpnk.netM to ✍️ Writing@slrpnk.netEnglish · 6 days ago

Coming to Terms With Climate Fiction

1

5

Coming to Terms With Climate Fiction

grrgyle@slrpnk.netM to ✍️ Writing@slrpnk.netEnglish · 6 days ago

1

Coming to Terms With Climate Fiction - Reactor

What once seemed like a subgenre of science fiction is actually much bigger

So I had it all wrong when I thought of “cli-fi” as a subset of sci-fi. The article makes a good case for normalising climate fiction - after all, climate change hasn’t been only speculative for a long time.

Chat

grrgyle@slrpnk.netOPM
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
1·
6 days ago
Also linked in that article is Matthew Salesses on the Possibilities of Climate Fiction, which I haven’t finished reading yet, but looks to put racism and climate change in conversation. Just to pick one quote:

Cli-fi’s orientation toward the future would make sense if we thought that climate change, unlike racism, were still avoidable. The trouble is that it is not. The too-lateness, in fact, is why I started this essay.

✍️ Writing@slrpnk.net

writing@slrpnk.net

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A community for writers, like poems, fiction, non-fiction, short stories, long books, all those sorts of things, to discuss writing approaches and what’s new in the writing world, and to help each other with writing.

Rules for now:

1. Try to be constructive and nice. When discussing approaches or giving feedback to excerpts, please try to be constructive and to maintain a positive vibe. For example, don’t just vaguely say something is bad but try to list and explain downsides, and if you can, also find some upsides. However, this is not to say that you need to pretend you liked something or that you need to hide or embellish what you disliked.

2. Mention own work for purpose and not mainly for promo: Feel free to post asking for feedback on excerpts or worldbuilding advice, but please don’t make posts purely for self promo like a released book. If you offer professional services like editing, this is not the community to openly advertise them either. (Mentioning your occupation on the side is okay.) Don’t link your excerpts via your website when asking for advice, but e.g. Google Docs or similar is okay. Don’t post entire manuscripts, focus on more manageable excerpts for people to give feedback on.

3. What happens in feedback or critique requests posts stays in these posts: Basically, if you encounter someone you gave feedback to on their work in their post, try not to quote and argue against them based on their concrete writing elsewhere in other discussions unless invited. (As an example, if they discuss why they generally enjoy outlining novels, don’t quote their excerpts to them to try to prove why their outlining is bad for them as a singled out person.) This is so that people aren’t afraid to post things for critique.

4. All writing approaches are valid. If someone prefers outlining over pantsing for example, it’s okay to discuss up- and downsides but don’t tell someone that their approach is somehow objectively worse. All approaches are on some level subjective anyway.

5. Solarpunk rules still apply. The general rules of solarpunk of course still apply.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

1 user / day
10 users / week
32 users / month
91 users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
113 subscribers
29 Posts
117 Comments
Modlog