Looking up those patents, the first alludes to a system where a player aims and fires an “item” toward a character in a field, and in doing so triggers combat, and then dives into extraordinary intricacies about switching between modes within this. The second is very similar, but seems more directly focused on tweaking previous patents to including being able to capture Pokémon in the wild, rather than only during battle. The third, rather wildly, seems to be trying to claim a modification to the invention of riding creatures in an open world and being able to transition between them easily.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Uhhhh…. You are aware of what topic you are posting in, right?

    Are you the Palworld developer then? This is preventing YOU from making a living?

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        So you’re cool if some other developer makes a knockoff of Palworld and sells it, right? Cause that knock off developer has to make a living, right? Where’s your empathy lie? With the Palworld developer or the knock off?

        • ayyy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yea I’m fine with that. Nobody would buy it.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Nintendo claims Palworld is a knockoff, and people bought it, so you’ve got a bit of a disconnect with reality and your positions.

            • ayyy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              You asked about a knockoff of Palworlds.