• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If I remember right, this wasn’t even illegal. A lot of places in the US still have this ancient (and fucking ridiculous even back when it was new) rule that the sheriff gets to pocket any leftover cash from the prisoner care budget.

    Yeah, anyways this is usually the reason behind it whenever you read anything about prisoners being fed roadkill or spoiled food or whatever. Ancient, incredibly brazen corruption.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 month ago

      the sheriff gets to pocket any leftover cash from the prisoner care budget

      That’s utterly insane.

      • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It was likely meant to be used for other means to buy what is needed. But clearly not written well to stop corruption

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Not at all, that’s the purpose. The article says this law was defined a century ago. It was the sheriffs personal responsibility to feed prisoners, so there was money set aside to do so.

          Certainly the law is not reasonable as soon as they got beyond the money coming from someone else, the town getting bigger, we have supposedly developed as a society, it’s no longer a frontier town

      • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        From this boot licking deepthroating article he was accused of molesting a 15 year old, the investigation ended with no charges filed and he lost his re-election campaign. He later filed a defamation suit against Connor Sheets, the man who wrote the articles about the food budget and statutory rape allegations. No idea how that turned out.

        Seriously though, don’t click the link unless you want to be mad. The author basically spends all his time going “Well it wasn’t legally wrong so that makes it morally upright!” it is fucking fawning.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is an interesting followup piece of the publication that broke the original story:

    https://www.al.com/news/2018/12/heres-how-federal-inmates-made-an-alabama-sheriff-15-million.html

    Some noteworthy pieces of information imho:

    • The total sum “leftover” after underfeeding and badly feeding was in the millions.
    • Keeping the Alabama “leftover” money was legal under state laws, for some crazy reason.
    • They also had a federal contract to keep ICE prisoners, and got federal money for that, which they did not treat separately from the Alabama money.
    • Another Republican (Jonathon Horton) unseated that swine Todd Entrekin in their primaries two to one.

    Then in 2019 the food account was finally made into a public one by the state legislature, 25% of it could still be misappropriated to other law enforcement activity though. Then in 2020 the was a referendum in Etowah county to make that percentage 100%, but I can’t find out how it went in the end. The Gadsen Times are blocked for European readers.

    https://www.al.com/news/2020/03/voters-in-2-alabama-counties-to-consider-jail-inmate-food-funds.html

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      What galls me about this, even more than fat sheriffs getting fatter by starving people, is the inference that since they’re following the law it’s all totally okay. I have an ideological problem not just with that statement, but the sentiment behind it.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes! The worst was this quote by Entrekin, hiding behind the law acting as if that’s all that matters:

        “It’s the law. I haven’t done anything wrong,” Entrekin said at the time. “If it’s wrong, somebody needs to change the law. I have asked [state legislators] to change the law and they have not changed it.”

        I’m with you on this one, just yesterday on a different post I said as much: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/25358559/14482392

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The part of the article saying they get $2/day to feed prisoners, yet the Sheriff “guarantees they are properly fed” and somehow skims $750,000 out of it

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        30 days ago

        I believe it was an old wild west bill still on the books that should have been replaced decades ago.

          • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            29 days ago

            Legality is temporary and blows in the wind.

            These people deserve to be held accountable for their actions, by an authority (ie Federals) capable of breaking through the shit layer of corruption and stink.