BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 13 hours agoLG’s first 480Hz OLED gaming monitor is $1,000www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up119arrow-down1external-linkLG’s first 480Hz OLED gaming monitor is $1,000www.theverge.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 13 hours agomessage-square14fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down5·13 hours agoWhat’s the point if the human eye can’t see beyond 30fps?
minus-squareRai@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·12 hours agoIt’s okay, I understood your comment without you needing to put that stupid “/s” in
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-210 hours agoI thought the joke was obvious but the number of downvotes says otherwise.
minus-squaref2sfljLhdtTZ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down4·12 hours agoThat’s not entirely correct. Have you tried using a 60hz and 165hz monitor? The difference is not slight.
minus-squarecrawancon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·12 hours agopresenting that human eye with the most up to date graphical developments provide a (however slight but still measurable) performance edge over slower refresh rates.
What’s the point if the human eye can’t see beyond 30fps?
It’s okay, I understood your comment without you needing to put that stupid “/s” in
I thought the joke was obvious but the number of downvotes says otherwise.
It was obvious to me!
That’s not entirely correct. Have you tried using a 60hz and 165hz monitor? The difference is not slight.
Number go up
presenting that human eye with the most up to date graphical developments provide a (however slight but still measurable) performance edge over slower refresh rates.