• BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 hours ago

    From the article

    “There’s an aspect of irony to the complaint: Elon Musk turned Twitter into a haven for racism and far-right rhetoric, after all, and he’s being rewarded with a high seat in the incoming US government.”

  • corroded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What are they referring to here exactly? Multiplayer games? Steam friends’ list? I have never at any point ever experienced extremist content on Steam; I use it as a convenient location to buy games. It’s a retail shop, not a social media site.

    • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Click on the community tab. There’s forums and shit there. There’s a shit ton of blatant racist shit, including people using highly offensive slurs and ascii art swastikas and stuff. It’s fucking disgusting.

  • Hal-5700X
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    18 minutes ago

    Silence, Fed.

    EDIT The ADL is a joke. Since they called Pepe a hate symbol. It’s just an meme.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Extremist as defined by who? Valve lets the customer decide what is too extreme for them, which is how it should be.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      As defined by Anti Defamation League, an Israeli lobbying group, based on their study on the use of language and emoji around steam forum, and the highest offensive emoji used count is…pepe.

      Second is swastika.

      Here’s the infograph:

    • alessandro@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Extremist as defined by who? Valve lets the customer decide what is too extreme for them, which is how it should be.

      I think is best also in your interest, as consumer (and human being, if you aren’t Zuckeberg or Bezos) if companies are called accountable for the crap they spread just to make investor happy.

      You may like Valve for their way of business, but the law doesn’t work per persona: what it allow is a allowed to everyone (generally and depending if you’re in a theocracy, oligarcy etc.)

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        No the way the law works is that distributors are not liable for what happens on their platforms by default, otherwise literally any kind of social media would be illegal/impossible unless we hired 6 billion people to moderate the other 2 billion. However if you curate the content you show to the user then you do become liable for that content (again this is the law not just my opinion).

        Valve as far as I know do not curate forum content, its just there and you can sort it by date. Facebook and Twitter on the other hand do have algorithms curating their content which does make them legally responsible for that content, especially since their algorithms seem to actually promote extremist content.