• flubba86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Oh man, now I’m conflicted. I had planned to buy a Qidi X-Plus3 for myself for Christmas. But this new prusa looks great. The Qidi is still bigger build volume with 280x280, and the qidi is half the price. But the prusa will have better community support, and software updates.

  • Grippler@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    large print volume (250×220×270 mm)

    Yeah that’s really not considered a large print volume anymore for consumer printers… It’s only slightly above standard of most printers these days…Hit me with minimum 300x300x300 print area and we can start calling it large build volume.

    Price is still too high IMO, it should be €1050 for the assembled printer, not the DIY kit.

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Price is still too high IMO, it should be €1050 for the assembled printer, not the DIY kit.

      Considering the Bambu X1C costs 1050€ I’m surprised they were able to get the kit price down to 1050€ while still manufacturing in the EU.

      Looking forward to the reviews to see how they compare.

      • Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You can self source a voron for that amount, and that’s without any of the benefits of large scale purchasing like Prusa has. I’m just really not impressed by the price point.

        • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I have a Voron 2.4 right now, and had a Prusa MK3 before that.

          It remains to be seen what additional work the kit amounts to. The Prusa XL can be assembled within a few hours while the Prusa MK3 is a day project and the Voron is a multi day project, not even including the time needed to research the different Voron kits.

          Assuming it does not lack in features or quality, I think the price for the kit is fair since it includes the full Prusa support, next day shipping for replacement parts and it is made in the EU. The Voron with its flying gantry is dope, but I do sometimes miss being able to just write Prusa about an issue and get replacement parts under warranty in 2-3 days.

        • AlDente
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          A Voron V2.4 for cost of this kit ($950 / 1050 EUR)? Sure buddy.

          • evidences@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            1,000 bucks isn’t far off what the middle of the road cost of a 2.4 is. I’ve seen kits for as low as like 550-600 bucks shipped, this is without printed parts. The high end stuff like LDO or Siboor are 1,200-1,500.

            • AlDente
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              From what I’ve seen, middle of the road 300 mm Voron V2.4 kits are around $1300. I believe the lowest I’ve seen was around $950, excluding printed parts (which the same company was selling separately for over $200). When I tried compiling a BOM with self-sourced high quality parts, the total reached over $1700 before I gave up on that idea. Where have you seen $600 kits? If these are still available, I may consider one. However, I’m hesitant to go with a kit that may have lower quality components. Personally, I’m really excited for this new Prusa and will probably pick up a kit once they are available. Unless, of course, Vorons are really that affordable.

            • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Is there a different current version that would be better to compare against the Prusa?

              • IMALlama@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                The trident is probably a more fair comparison given that both it and the CORE One use 3x lead screws to move (and presumably level) the bed.

                You can get a 300mm^3 LDO trident kit for $1,200, which appears to be the price of the Prusa. You can of course go cheaper (formbot for $690 with a V6 hot end) and more expensive (a custom BOM in a box from say West3d that starts at $1,300).

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Honestly this is better than I expected from Prusa. They are still playing catch-up but not as far behind as I expected them to end up with their first consumer XY offering. It’s till expensive for what you get (Prusa). It’s too slow compared to competitors. It’s a bit small for the price. They need a new hotend setup. But it definitely maintains the Prusa serviceability. Their MMU is still kind of a DIY joke versus the competitors.

    • AlDente
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This is not their first core XY and they redesigned the hotend with the PrusaXL and MK4. As far as I’ve seen, they are the only printer company using a strain gauge in the hotend for bed leveling, that they also use for detecting clogs while printing. Also, the new printer’s price is comparible to the similar model from Bambu with a metal frame and enclosed print bed (X1C). And, as you pointed out, they always maintained the same serviceability (I’ll add upgradability). Therefore, I definitely don’t agree that they are playing catch up.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I think it’s honestly a bit embarrassing after reading through this. It states that their “main engineering focus when designing this” was “the exoskeleton, a small chamber, and a platform for the future.” The exoskeleton is just a rectangular frame that nobody is going to give a shit about while printing and the small chamber means a small build plate along with it.

      The main feature they seem to be hyping up is the fact that it has a vent in the body so that you don’t have to crack the door open. This does feel a bit lame with the Bambu, but not anything I really care about at the end of the day.

      I’ve said it before that I do like Prusa represents as a company, but they’re really behind the ball at this price point.

  • einkorn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Aaaaaaaahrg! Guess who recently bought an MK4S and thought “Wish it was a CoreXY, though”?

    Edit:

    transform your MK4S fully into the CORE One without a single compromise. We are aiming for a release date in March 2025 with the projected price of 449 USD (VAT excl.) / 489 EUR (VAT incl.).

    Well, at least there is that…

    • Mellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I saw the video this morning before work. I’m in the same boat as you. Bought a MK4s about 2 months ago. Very happy with it, but I want that CORE One.

      The product page says it won’t ship until Jan ‘25, so I’m just gonna be patient and wait for stock to arrive at PrintedSolid in the US. Hopefully they’ll have some by summer. If I still want it that badly I’ll get it. Maybe the urge will pass and I’ll be content with my MK4s.

      • einkorn@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just read that as well, but that’s $500 on top plus $300 I “wasted” on the enclosure for the MK4S.

        • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          My enclosure has the MMU3 and all 5 spools crammed in there, very space efficient

          I’m also gonna cram the filter in there when I get around to it.

          This new one can’t seem to support more than a single spool on the side tho

        • asbestos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Seems like it’d be better for you to sell your enclosed MK4S and just buy this one as a kit

            • Ajen
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              I haven’t tried, but it sounds like it’s hard to sell used printers. Maybe it’d be easier to sell the enclosure (less risk for the buyer) and buy the upgrade kit? Either way, it’s not like you wasted your money on the MK4S.

              • einkorn@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                I’ve sold used printers in the past without much trouble. But yeah, it’s not like the MK4S is bad or anything like that. This is more a case of first world problems.

  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Temperature controlled chamber.

    This is a great feature, for this alone I would love to get one.

    Having a temperature controlled chamber AND Prusa profiles to easily set it up is amazing.

    Right now I’m avoiding printing stuff in ABS, ASA or Nylon because of that, even though I have an enclosure on the MK4s I often have issues with these material. It’s working but it is not click and forget like PLA or PETG.

    • radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Is this actively heated or just temperature controlled? From what I saw it just has vents to allow heat to escape (think leaving the door open when printing PLA).

      If it was actively heated I would buy it in a heart beat, Voron doesn’t even like people talking about it due to the high danger if done wrong.

      EDIT: Yeah just looks like the bed heater still unfortunately. I have a modded enclosed Ender 5 I just have a heat soak script tied to a thermistor midway up the frame so I’ll hold off until there’s an actual separate heating element. Hopefully soon!

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          That doesn’t mean anything to a patent troll company like Stratasys. They have tons of generalized patents issued in the last few years on things the 3d printer community has been using as prior art for decades prior and they are using that as a basis to take down Bambu. Like heated beds, lmfao. They’ll make some shit up and sue anyway because they’re becoming irrelevant and are unable to compete legitimately anymore. And the Texas court well known for protecting corporate interests will hand them whatever they want.