kopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 天前ruleskymedia.d.on-t.workimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1131arrow-down134
arrow-up197arrow-down1imageruleskymedia.d.on-t.workkopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 天前message-square23fedilink
minus-squarekrimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·5 天前how do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
minus-squaremindbleachlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·4 天前Phase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
minus-squaremorphballganon@mtgzone.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 天前So, baseless speculation?
minus-squaregfle@szmer.infolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 天前I’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.
minus-squarekrimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·4 天前even if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
how do they make money? there’s no ads and it’s free
Phase one enshittification. They’re burning VC money to acquire users, who they will then betray.
So, baseless speculation?
I’d rather say that it’s “learning from history of similar services”. Facebook also seemed nice in the beginning.
YouTube was like that too
even if they suddenly put ads on it (which would be stupid since no ads is one of their main selling points) it’d still be better than twitter/threads
for now