Summary

Dawson City in Canada is facing a crisis as the new mayor and councillors won’t take the required oath of allegiance to King Charles.

They refused in support of an Indigenous councillor who opposes the oath due to the Crown’s history with Indigenous people.

Without the oath, their election could be canceled, and they can’t make official decisions.

The council has asked for a different oath, but Yukon law requires the pledge. Authorities are now looking into the situation.

  • [email protected]A
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Québec has gotten rid of the royal oath requirement, surely Yukon can think of something.

    • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I am only a Canadian, and not a Canadian lawyer, but I don’t think it will be as simple for Yukon. The biggest reason I can think of is that Yukon is a territory, and not a province, and so has different constitutional standing. From the government webpage:

      There is a clear constitutional distinction between provinces and territories. While provinces exercise constitutional powers in their own right, the territories exercise delegated powers under the authority of the Parliament of Canada.

      I’m not saying it isn’t possible, just that the same legal maneuvers Quebec used may not be applicable.

      • [email protected]A
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yea it’s likely more complicated for them.
        The whole thing is bullshit if you ask me and territories should be on equal footing with provinces.
        The royal oath should be abolished country wide.

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Also, doesn’t Québec have some special considerations above the rest of the provinces? I seem to recall we deigned them a ‘nation within a nation’ or some such back in the mid 00’s. I’m not sure if there were any legal ramifications to that, though.

        • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          They might, but I can’t say for certain. I didn’t mention it because, again, I’m not a Canadian lawyer, and the basic info on provinces vs territories was far more accessible.

          • HellsBelle
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            Quebec law is unique in Canada because Quebec is the only province in Canada to have a juridical legal system under which civil matters are regulated by French-heritage civil law. Public law, criminal law and federal law operate according to Canadian common law.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_law