Giving money to Amazon, Wal-Mart, Microsoft, Google .etc

It’s like, you can’t have an argument for price gouging, when you’re enabling them by spending. If people were smart, they’d stop giving them money 10 - 15 years ago and they’d be right now, trying to reconstruct so they can be more economically friendly than how they are now.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m doing better now, but 15 years ago Walmart was the only option I had for food. Local/regional grocery stores were more expensive and I was living paycheck to paycheck with growing debt.

    “If people were smart they would stop buying the most cost-efficient option” is really not feasible.

    “If people were smart” they would read and stop putting oligarchs in power.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “If people were smart they would stop buying the most cost-efficient option” is really not feasible.

      In fact, more and more people don’t have the luxury of buying more expensive options.

      Of course, stealing is an option, and I think ‘If people were smart’ they would accept that stealing from Walmart is not an ethical or pragmatic problem, but it’s a risky behavior so I wouldn’t criticize people for not stealing. [edit: see Fubarberry’s reply]

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Stealing from walmart also isn’t sustainable if many people are doing it. For example there were a ton of walmarts and other stores in the Chicago area that recently closed due to high theft at those locations. Now whole communities there are left without convenient shopping options, which can be a big problem for people with limited transportation options.

        • comfy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Good point. If there aren’t other local stores remaining to fill the gaps, then that would be a critical problem.

        • mke_geek@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Stealing isn’t right.

          The Walmart near me closed due to high theft. There were actually people stealing from the construction site when the store was being built, so it really was a ticking clock as to how long the store itself would even last.

          Some people are just awful.

          • comfy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            Stealing isn’t right.

            I conditionally disagree. In fact, there are many real situations where stealing is the right option. There are valid reasons why folk lore glorifies figures like Robin Hood. And when it comes to international conglomerates like Walmart, which hoard astronomical wealth while others who can’t afford bread starve nearby, theft of the hoard is justice in its most appropriate form (if one values human survival more than legal property rights).

                • NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  Look. There was a subreddit that got banned because it was a bunch of shoplifters, dumb ones, showcasing what they stole. They all claim that they’re doing it to hurt corporations.

                  If anyone had a clue at all about working retail - that’s not how it works. The corporation is going to be sailing just fine. It’s you, the worker and the store that’s getting hurt.

                  And that’s why these shoplifters are absolute assholes. They steal enough, the store is closed, many jobs lost.

                  How the fuck is that hurting the corporation?

    • NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      But you’ll notice that the price comparison is narrowing and Wal-Mart is slowly not looking better off than the competition. It’s almost like shopping at Dollar Tree is more feasible, it’s what some of us are going to be forced to be doing if not now. Just shopping Dollar Tree almost regularly.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ignoring the fact that alternative voting systems exist and there can be more then two political parties.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    The obvious answer is fossil fuels, right? Few people want to cook the climate, they just can’t quite fathom something that abstract and slow-moving, so they do it anyway.

    Less obviously, feeding all our most sensitive data to random websites and apps. Again, the threat just doesn’t look enough like a sabre-tooth tiger.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fossil fuels is kinda a prisoner’s dilemma issue. Everyone cooperating to save the planet is obviously ideal, but realistically there are always going to be companies/countries that won’t. And as long as it’s cheaper to not be environmentally friendly, there’s always going to be someone taking that option.

      For example, lets say country A passes new regulations on manufacturing to be more environmentally friendly. The new regulations take the country’s manufacturing from low pollution to very low pollution. However the increase in cost causes many companies to stop manufacturing locally, and instead outsource their manufacturing to country B with low regulation and moderate pollution during manufacturing. The end result is more money leaving the local economy of country A, and increased global pollution.

      It’s a similar prisoner’s dilemma for the individual companies involved. If your competitor is able to make their product for cheaper because their process is less environmentally friendly, then they can undercut you and put you out of business.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The tragedy of the commons is definitely part of it, but until recently there was a sort of global consensus anyway. Domestically climate change action - real action - is unpopular.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Few people want to cook the climate, they just can’t quite fathom something that abstract and slow-moving, so they do it anyway.

      I don’t think the problem is that people are unaware. Even people who believe they are against cooking the environment have other rationalisations, like “the economy isn’t able to shut down all the coal plants yet, it’ll collapse”. Propaganda is a hell of a drug.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        No, it’s not that people are unaware, or even don’t believe it, it’s that they can’t reason about it strategically

        It’s spending now to save later. If that’s about military spending or emergency services everyone gets paying taxes for it, but words are as far as most will go to stop nonspecific far future weather. Even when people talk about the situation with climate change, you hear them frame it in moral terms instead of practical terms.

        Case in point: Canada has a carbon tax, and a majority want to get rid of it. Denialism is not a prominent part of the campaign, just the fact that it costs something. And not even much, and it’s all given back in refunds - doesn’t matter, the extra gas cost people will bear is zero.

  • MrSebSin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    They would understand that socialism is not communism. Also you can have capitalism and socialism at the same time, you just have to give and take a little.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      They would understand that socialism is not communism.

      Socialism has so many definitions that this can be subjectively true or false. This isn’t even some trivial gotcha, the terms were used interchangeably even by significant writers of the 1800s. For another example, a socialist mode of production and a capitalist mode of production are contradictory.

      If one wants to make these kind of broad claims without starting pointless arguments, they’ll need to use a more specific term than ‘socialism’.

  • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Drinking alcohol. Lots of people drink way too much and make life ruining decisions.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thinking that “being smart” means shit. We need to realize that the people who run things aren’t necessarily smart. Presidents aren’t necessarily smart. Professors aren’t necessarily smart.

    And being smart doesn’t mean you’re good. Evil smart is a nightmare, because destroying is so much easier than building.

    What would we do if we were good? Now that’s a question.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Processed food and high sugar diets are killing us.

    These foods are addictive, and ubiquitous. A well informed and smart american would still have a problem switching over to whole food only. (Where the ingredient label only says one thing).

  • Mesa@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thinking that they have the “one simple trick” for everything when most matters are actually a complex network of issues where there isn’t one answer.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    Building electric car charging stations without security cameras.

    About 75% of the chargers are disabled in my city. The primary method of disabling them is roll up with a sawzall and just chop the cable off. Gets you $5 worth of crack, which is always a nice incentive structure when there’s unguarded copper lying around.

    The only chargers that survive are in front of 24 hour businesses.