This is a pretty great, long form post about the structure of Bluesky, and how it’s largely kinda pretending to be decentralized at the moment. I’m not trying to make a dig at it. I’ve enjoyed the platform myself for a while, but it’s good to learn more about how it actually works.

This article was shared on Mastodon via its author here.

  • Patch@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    That’s a really interesting read (and worth much more attention than the pithy one-liners of people who just want to read the title).

    On reflection, I think my take away is that Bluesky will always by necessity of its design be hosted and controlled by a single centralised company. But what their architectural model does allow is the possibility of a wholesale migration from one centralised provider to another. That is, it would be possible for a suitably resourced and motivated company to host its own mirror Relay and other components and have essentially a fully functional Bluesky clone. In the event that Bluesky ever “does a Twitter” and go into terminal decline, in theory this might mean that a successor/competitor could emerge and take on the network without loss of existing content.

    I’m not sure that’ll ever actually happen, but it’s an interesting thought.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Interesting point, and shows that most likely, any instance of Bkuesky will eventually go Twitter