Published: 2024-11-07
Abstract
It is undeniable that conversational agents took the world by storm. Chatbots such as ChatGPT (Generative Pre Trained) are used for translations, financial advice, and even as therapists, by millions of users every month. When interacting with technology it’s important to be careful, especially if we do so by using natural language, since our relationship with artificial agents is shaped by the technology’s features and the manufacturer’s goal. The paper, organized into three sections, explores the question of whether ChatGPT’s production can be described as ‘bullshit’. In the first section, the focus is on ChatGPT’s architecture and development; in the second a new formulation of the concept of Frankfurt’s ‘bullshit’ is presented, in which its central features of indifference, deception and manipulation are highlighted; in the last section, the title question is tackled, proposing an affirmative answer to it, arguing that ChatGPT can be considered a ‘bullshit’ generator.
You must log in or register to comment.
I would loosely define “Bullshit” as something composed to sound plausible, without any relation to or concern with the truth.
By that loose definition, ChatGPT is nothing BUT Bullshit. Putting together statements purely because they sound right, with exactly zero concern for what is actually true.
In 1986, philosopher Harry Frankfurt wrote an essay titled On Bullshit, in which he isolated and studied the title concept. He argues that ‘bullshit’ can be defined as a statement made with no concern for truth. The bullshitter is a person who has both no intention to describe reality accurately nor to lie. Bullshitting is therefore well distinguished from lying: whilst the liar knows that they are on the wrong side of the truth, and they feel a certain guilt about it, the bullshitter displays indifference toward their position. The truth-values of their own statements are of no concern to them.
TLDR; yes.
Of course it fucking is
Yes, it is.
